Re: pgbench tap tests & minor fixes

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench tap tests & minor fixes
Date: 2017-04-24 07:01:18
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1704240859200.2912@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> To sum up:
> - I agree to add a generic command TestLib & a wrapper in PostgresNode,
> instead of having pgbench specific things in the later, then call
> them from pgbench test script.
> - I still think that moving the pgbench scripts inside the test script
> is a bad idea (tm).

Here is a v2 along those lines.

I have also separated some basic test which do not need a server running,
as done in other tap tests.


Attachment Content-Type Size
pgbench-tap-2.patch text/x-diff 34.7 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-04-24 07:41:56 Re: Interval for launching the table sync worker
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-04-24 05:55:05 Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.