Re: bytea_output output of base64

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bytea_output output of base64
Date: 2017-02-24 08:18:06
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1702240906540.21598@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> It undoubtedly would make pg_dump smaller, though I'm not sure how much
> that's worth since if you care at all about that you'll gzip it.
>
> But, the other thing it might do is speed up COPY, especially on input. Some
> performance tests of that might be interesting.

For what it is worth:

Ascii85 (aka Base85) is used in PDF by Adobe, with a prefix "<~" and a
suffix "~>". It codes 4 bytes as 5 ascii characters, i.e. a 25% loss.
There is also Z85 which avoids some special characters: backslash, single
quote, double quote.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-24 08:30:39 Re: UPDATE of partition key
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2017-02-24 07:48:27 Re: UPDATE of partition key