Re: RustgreSQL

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RustgreSQL
Date: 2017-01-08 10:12:28
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1701081105280.10378@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> Is this completely unrealistic or is it carved in stone PostgreSQL will
>> always be a C project forever and ever?
>
> From my very limited understanding, PostgreSQL is more likely to be converted
> to C++!

ISTM that currently pg is written C89. Personnaly I think that C99
(standard from 18 years ago...) would be a progress, but this has been
rejected in the past because of portability issues on some platforms (eg
MS Visual C++ started to support part of C99 in ... 2013).

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2017-01-08 14:08:04 Re: RustgreSQL
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2017-01-08 09:59:10 Re: RustgreSQL