Re: Logical Replication WIP

From: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication WIP
Date: 2016-11-20 18:23:06
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.11.1611201315030.30251@opti.atlantida
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016, Petr Jelinek wrote:

> On 13/11/16 23:02, Steve Singer wrote:

> There is one exception though:
>> *** 195,214 ****
>> </para>
>> <para>
>> A conflict will produce an error and will stop the replication; it
>> ! must be resolved manually by the user.
>> </para>
>> <para>
>> ! The resolution can be done either by changing data on the subscriber
>> ! so that it does not conflict with incoming change or by skipping the
>> ! transaction that conflicts with the existing data. The transaction
>> ! can be skipped by calling the
>> ! <link linkend="pg-replication-origin-advance">
>> ! <function>pg_replication_origin_advance()</function></link> function
>> ! with a <literal>node_name</> corresponding to the subscription name. The
>> ! current position of origins can be seen in the
>> ! <link linkend="view-pg-replication-origin-status">
>> ! <structname>pg_replication_origin_status</structname></link> system view.
>> ! </para>
>> </sect1>
>> <sect1 id="logical-replication-architecture">
>
> I don't see why this needs to be removed? Maybe it could be improved but
> certainly not removed?
>

Sorry, I was confused. I noticed that the function was missing in the patch
and thought it was documentation for a function that you had removed from
recent versions of the patch versus referencing a function that is already
committed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2016-11-20 22:02:25 Re: Mail thread references in commits
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2016-11-20 18:06:00 Re: Logical Replication WIP