| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff |
| Date: | 2015-12-16 10:33:09 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1512161124590.31973@sto |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>> It seems also that it would be a good idea to split the patch into two
>>> parts:
>>> 1) Refactor the code so as the existing test scripts are put under the
>>> same umbrella with addScript, adding at the same time the new option
>>> -b.
>>> 2) Add the weight facility and its related statistics.
>>
>> Sigh. The patch & documentation are probably not independent, so that would
>> make two dependent patches, probably.
>
> I am not really saying so, it seems just that doing the refactoring
> (with its related docs), and then add the extension for the weight
> (with its docs) is more natural than doing both things at the same
> time.
Ok. I can separate the refactoring (scripts & stats) and the weight stuff
on top of the refactoring.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2015-12-16 10:59:48 | Re: Parallel Aggregate |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-12-16 10:14:54 | Re: pg_stat_replication log positions vs base backups |