| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de> |
| Cc: | mail(at)bwe(dot)im, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i |
| Date: | 2015-05-21 08:10:04 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1505211001110.14769@sto |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hello Oleksandr,
>> HINT: is "foo" the right database? did you initialize first (pgbench -i)?
>
> I don't think there is precedent for spitting out "HINT:" in client code
> (at least grep didn't find it). So this message might look like it's
> coming from the server, while it doesn't.
I do not see that as a problem. From my point of view a "HINT" is just
what it is, and the message says clearly that it comes from pgbench.
> I think the following is closer to pre-existing experience, IMO:
> + fprintf(stderr, "Is \"%s\" the right database? Did you initialize it first (pgbench -i)?\n", dbName);
Hmmm. I liked to have a prefix on the line, that gives a purpose to the
sentence. Maybe:
HINT (pgbench): Is "foo" the right database? Did you initialize (-i) first?
Or
pgbench: ...
Or
pgbench HINT: ...
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shulgin, Oleksandr | 2015-05-21 08:20:56 | Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i |
| Previous Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2015-05-21 07:51:57 | Re: BUG #12379: pgbench should hint to pgbench -i |