Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] big test separation POC
Date: 2013-07-11 18:56:46
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.02.1307112053210.11644@localhost6.localdomain6
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> The other option, suggested by Andres somewhere, is to have a new
> parameter to pg_regress, something like --run-serially.

After looking at the source, ISTM that this option already exists under a
different signature:

--max-connections 1

> So you would use the same parallel schedule file, but serially instead
> of following the parallel specification.

Yep. And there is nothing to do, which is even better:-)

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-07-11 19:09:45 Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2013-07-11 18:53:57 Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext