| From: | david(at)lang(dot)hm |
|---|---|
| To: | Gernot Schwed <Gernot(dot)Schwed(at)onvista-group(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres replication |
| Date: | 2008-04-30 20:47:00 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.1.10.0804301345240.7807@asgard |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Gernot Schwed wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> looking for a HA master/master or master/slave replication solution. Our
> setup consists of two databases and we want to use them both for queries.
>
>
> Aside from pgpool II there seems no advisable replication solution. But
> the problem seems to be that we will have a single point of failure with
> pgpool. slony also has the disadvantage not to cover a real failover
> solution. Are there any other manageable and well tested tools/setups for
> our scenario?
I'm about to setup a similar config and what I was intending to do is to
run pgpool on both boxes and use heartbeat (from http://linux-ha.org ) to
move an IP address from one box to the other. clients connect to this
virtual IP and then pgpool will distribute the connections to both systems
from there.
David Lang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-04-30 22:47:02 | Re: Understanding histograms |
| Previous Message | Gauri Kanekar | 2008-04-30 16:47:46 | Re: Replication Syatem |