Re: data type of projected item in a union not correct

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: the6campbells <the6campbells(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: data type of projected item in a union not correct
Date: 2012-09-25 03:31:20
Message-ID: alpine.BSO.2.00.1209242317380.1873@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, the6campbells wrote:

> The following projection is not described with the expected type+precision
> as one would expect from ISO-SQL
>
> Is this a known Postgres bug, quirk or ....

This is a serverside problem. Try the same test in psql or similar.

jurka=# create table t as select 'a'::varchar(32) as c1,
'b'::varchar(32) as c2 union select 'c'::char(32),
'd'::varchar(32);
SELECT 2
jurka=# \d t
Table "public.t"
Column | Type | Modifiers
--------+-----------------------+-----------
c1 | character varying |
c2 | character varying(32) |

As you can see the c1 column has had the length information dropped.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message GEISINGER Marc - Contractor 2012-09-26 14:38:23 Re: Bug in AbstracJdbc2Statement.replaceProcessing when using dollar quoting?
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2012-09-25 03:17:27 Re: Bug in AbstracJdbc2Statement.replaceProcessing when using dollar quoting?