| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Whitelisting? |
| Date: | 2010-02-02 19:19:48 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.BSF.2.00.1002021519180.78920@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Selena Deckelmann escribi?:
>>> Can we whitelist robert(at)pg-live(dot)info? He's got some large headers that
>>> are tripping up majordomo, and I'm having to approve lotsa stuff.
>>
>> I think the right answer is to increase the header limit. I get some
>> moderation requests from large headers on legitimate email too.
>
> I like that solution too!
>
> The high water mark was about 500. Here's an example error message:
>
>> A MIME header is too long (444 > 256)
Does doubling to 512 sound okay? Or should I just go straight to 1024?
thoughts?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy(at)hub(dot)org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-02 19:42:15 | Re: Whitelisting? |
| Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2010-02-02 16:45:43 | Re: Whitelisting? |