Re: Change checkpoint‑record‑missing PANIC to FATAL

On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 09:56:05AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hmm, actually.. I am wondering if this could be made simpler by
> writing a fully-synthetic backup_label file instead, meaning that we
> would not need the dance with the injection points because we could
> reuse the redo and checkpoint LSNs of the previous step, then we just
> add the checkpoint segment to the starting node's pg_wal/. I admit
> that it feels artistic, but it is much less complicated than your
> version, more efficient, and would still check the error path we care
> about.

Just looked at that again, and after a second lookup that still seems
fine. Applied to close the thread.
--
Michael