| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Diego Frias <mail(at)dzfrias(dot)dev> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Interest in Faster Unicode Normalization |
| Date: | 2026-06-29 02:39:20 |
| Message-ID: | akHa2HrsXbvdo9KL@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 05:06:09PM -0700, Diego Frias wrote:
> I was wondering if Postgres was interested in this work. I know that
> my project is an early-stage library, but I think it could be of use
> to Postgres in some way or another. Is there any way I could apply my
> work to help Postgres? I’ve been working on this project for a while
> and honestly just want to see if any larger open source projects are
> interested.
I would definitely encourage you to look at the other thread and
to participate in its discussion. One of the bottlenecks of the
proposed patch is that we were still discussing how the normalization
tables should be shaped to make the operations faster. Perhaps what
you have in mind could be applied on top of what the other approaches
are implementing, but it's hard to tell without a patch. Duplicating
discussions for the same matter feels useless to me, because the goal
is the same: we want to make the normalizations faster, let's decide
one design that fits best.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-06-29 02:53:05 | Re: Add a statistics view to track usage of deprecated features |
| Previous Message | Tender Wang | 2026-06-29 02:31:30 | Re: Fix HAVING-to-WHERE pushdown with mismatched operator families |