Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify pg_stat_lock.fastpath_exceeded scope

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tatsuya Kawata <kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: clarify pg_stat_lock.fastpath_exceeded scope
Date: 2026-06-29 00:31:36
Message-ID: akG86CA-6Jay_lPm@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 11:14:16PM +0900, Tatsuya Kawata wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed thought. I looked at that paragraph. I was
> hoping to fold the two together, but the content did not seem to
> overlap, so I limited the change to adding a link as you suggested.

I'm finding that rather acceptable. Bertrand-san, what do you think?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-06-29 00:31:52 Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-06-29 00:28:00 Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum