| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread |
| Date: | 2026-07-09 05:35:28 |
| Message-ID: | ak8zIOUFZ9x6ypi2@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 11:51:06AM -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 11:34 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> But that doesn't matter much given that your list
>> shows other LTS distros still on 3.0.
>
> Right. I think 3.0 would be a reasonable floor for PG20, honestly. I'm
> a little concerned about how long the Deb-alikes are going to end up
> pinning it, but... one step at a time.
That would mean to drop OpenSSL 1.1.1, as there is nothing in-between
up to 3.0.0. That feels OK to drop for PG20, even if support for 3.0
will end in a few months, as of September 2026:
https://openssl-library.org/roadmap/
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | solai v | 2026-07-09 05:38:20 | Re: [PATCH] no table rewrite when set column type to constrained domain |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2026-07-09 05:31:02 | Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas |