Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum
Date: 2026-06-24 03:40:16
Message-ID: ajtRoKXDIkvEiX_h@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 11:21:46AM +0800, cca5507 wrote:
> It seems that the original permission check in get_all_vacuum_rels() is added
> by you in commit a556549d7e6dce15fe216bd4130ea64239f4d83f.

Aye, I'm aware of that. :D
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-06-24 03:49:26 psql: add tab completion for subscription wal_receiver_timeout
Previous Message Dmitrii Bondar 2026-06-24 03:26:14 Re: Pgbench: remove synchronous prepare