Re: [PATCH] Warn when io_min_workers exceeds io_max_workers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: baji(dot)pgdev(at)gmail(dot)com, tristan(at)partin(dot)io, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warn when io_min_workers exceeds io_max_workers
Date: 2026-06-23 22:13:41
Message-ID: ajsFFUyzXFtcAkg9@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 02:36:32PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> As Michael suggested, using placeholders for the GUC names could make
> similar messages easier to share in the future, which may also help
> reduce the number of translation strings. I wouldn't consider it
> necessary to adjust the existing
> autovacuum_max_workers/autovacuum_worker_slots message as part of this
> patch, though.

Yes. A lot of messages of v19 should already be translated, I guess?
I don't think that this is something we have to do in v19, so let's
just align everything once v20 opens up (minus tweaks to the wording
of the strings).
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben Mejia 2026-06-23 22:36:06 Re: hashjoins vs. Bloom filters (yet again)
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2026-06-23 21:11:04 Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions