| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [(known) BUG] DELETE/UPDATE more than one row in partitioned foreign table |
| Date: | 2026-06-10 22:25:28 |
| Message-ID: | ainkWN3s-12__fpo@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 08:22:31PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 2:38 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> I would not object with a switch of the default behavior across major
>> versions, and perhaps my argument is not sound enough, but I've learnt
>> my share when it comes to be careful with changes like the one you may
>> introduce here across a minor release, particularly knowing that
>> remotely_inherited *can* be set on an option basis when creating a
>> table *or* when importing a schema. The designs we have for these
>> queries allows this kind of flexibility.
>
> I agree that we should take a more conservative approach especially on
> the stable branches, and I think it's a good idea to add the option to
> IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA for that, so I will update the patch as such in
> the next version.
Cool, thanks.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-06-10 22:30:42 | Re: [(known) BUG] DELETE/UPDATE more than one row in partitioned foreign table |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-06-10 22:17:26 | Re: Fix unqualified catalog references in psql describe queries |