| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | 'Vishal Prasanna' <vishal(dot)g(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] Assert failure in ReorderBufferReturnTXN during logical decoding due to leaked specinsert change |
| Date: | 2026-06-10 13:04:48 |
| Message-ID: | ailfSO6tWX0toG-F@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hello,
On 2026-Mar-27, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Dear Vishal,
>
> I noticed commitfest app got angry your patch, but your patch could still be applied.
> Per my understanding, cfbot tried to apply all patches to master but failed.
> Here are fixed version, only suffix is changed for some patches.
Thanks. As far as I can tell this is just a leak, right? There's
nothing that misbehaves when assertions are disabled, even with
MEMORY_CONTEX_CHECKING -- it's just a small, very improbably mem leak.
I'm tempted not to touch REL_14_STABLE with it in that case.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I am amazed at [the pgsql-sql] mailing list for the wonderful support, and
lack of hesitasion in answering a lost soul's question, I just wished the rest
of the mailing list could be like this." (Fotis)
https://postgr.es/m/200606261359.k5QDxE2p004593@auth-smtp.hol.gr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2026-06-10 13:09:12 | Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW |
| Previous Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2026-06-10 11:08:56 | Re: BUG #19484: Segmentation fault triggered by FDW |