| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes |
| Date: | 2026-06-06 13:08:05 |
| Message-ID: | aiQPgZtALNqj4npv@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-Jun-05, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I want to thank everyone for the fixes/improvements they have supplied
> > for the PG 19 release notes. I am now satisfied with them and I think
> > they are close to what they will look link for PG 19 final. Here are the
> > current contents:
> https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-19.html
Thanks for putting these together! I have a few comments:
* In the incompatibilities section, we have
- Prevent carriage returns and line feeds in database, role, and
tablespace names
This was changed to avoid security problems. pg_upgrade will also
disallow upgrading of clusters that use such names.
The verb "prevent" here is a bit strange; I think "reject" would be
better. Also, I think the phrase involving pg_upgrade should come
before the reason for the change.
We also have this item:
Change the default index opclasses for inet and cidr data types from
btree_gist to GiST
The btree_gist inet/cidr opclasses are broken because they can exclude
rows that should be returned. pg_upgrade will fail to upgrade if
btree_gist inet/cidr indexes exist in the old server.
Why do we say "pg_upgrade will fail to upgrade" here instead of the
(IMO better) wording in the previous item? That is, "pg_upgrade will
disallow upgrading if btree_gist inet/cidr indexes exist in the old
server". The current wording of "fail to" suggest that this is a
pg_upgrade shortcoming, which it isn't.
* In section E.1.3.1.1 Optimizer, I think the item
"Allow extended statistics on virtual generated columns"
should come before all other items, because it's the only one that
requires user action in order for them to take advantage of it. All
the other items refer to some optimization that occurs automatically.
* Section E.1.3.1.2 General Performance, the item
Allow autovacuum to use parallel vacuum workers
lacks a link to
https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/sql-createtable.html#RELOPTION-AUTOVACUUM-PARALLEL-WORKERS
* Section E.1.3.1.3 System Views, the two items
Add vacuum initiation details to system view pg_stat_progress_vacuum
Add analyze initiation details to system view pg_stat_progress_analyze
Maybe they should be a single entry?
Add vacuum and analyze initiation details to system view
pg_stat_progress_vacuum and pg_stat_progress_analyze respectively
(Not really sure about this one)
* E.1.3.1.4 Monitoring
Add server variable log_autoanalyze_min_duration to log long-running
autoanalyze operations (Shinya Kato) §
Server variable log_autovacuum_min_duration now only controls logging
of autovacuum operations.
I think it's confusing to talk about "autoanalyze" as if it were
an action taken by an agent other than autovacuum. I mean, we have
autovacuum which runs autovacuums and also autovacuum which runs
autoanalyzes? To my mind that makes no sense -- I think we have one
autovacuum, which runs vacuum and analyze.
I would explain this as
Add server variable log_autoanalyze_min_duration to log long-running
analyze operations run by autovacuum (Shinya Kato) §
Server variable log_autovacuum_min_duration now only controls logging
of vacuum operations run by autovacuum.
* Add WAL full-page write bytes reporting to VACUUM and ANALYZE logging
(Shinya Kato) §
Maybe this should be "Report bytes of full-page WAL writes to VACUUM
and ANALYZE logging".
(This also appears in E.1.3.3.3 EXPLAIN and E.1.3.1.3 System Views)
* Add function pg_get_multixact_stats() to report multixact activity
(Naga Appani) §
I think this item should appear second in the section, right after the
one for log_min_messages, on importance grounds.
* Two entries make the acronym LSN point to
https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/wal-internals.html
I think a better target is the glossary item
https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/glossary.html#GLOSSARY-LOG-SEQUENCE-NUMBER
The shorter definition in the glossary is possibly more useful for a
release note reader; and if they want even more detail, the glossary
definition does point to the WAL internals.
A third entry appears in E.1.3.1.6
* E.1.3.1.5 Server Configuration
* Allow online enabling and disabling of data checksums
Previously the checksum status could only be set at initialization and
changed only while the cluster was offline using pg_checksums.
The word "only" appears twice in the second phrase, which is awkward.
Maybe reword it as
Previously the checksum status would be fixed at initialization time and
only changed while the cluster was offline usiNG PG_checksums.
* Add scoring system to control the order that tables are autovacuumed
I think using "autovacuumed" as a verb is terrible grammar. I would
rather have "... are processed by autovacuum".
* Allow background workers to be configured to terminate before
database-level operations (Aya Iwata) §
This sounds far too mysterious; it probably warrants more detail.
Also, move it a bit upwards: just below SNI perhaps? (That isn't
much, but all the other items in this section also look valuable.)
* E.1.3.3.2 Copy
* Allow COPY TO to output partitioned tables (Jian He, Ajin Cherian) § §
"to output partitioned tables"? This reads really awkward.
What about ... "Allow partitioned tables to be [processed / read] by
COPY TO directly" or something like that?
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La vida es para el que se aventura"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-06-06 13:25:39 | Re: Fix race in ReplicationSlotRelease for ephemeral slots |
| Previous Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-06-06 12:56:10 | Re: t/035_standby_logical_decoding.pl might fail on attempt to read wrong timeline |