| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | 彭冲 <chong(dot)peng(at)enmotech(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes |
| Date: | 2026-05-30 18:57:15 |
| Message-ID: | ahszC5QE2aRMJqf7@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 11:30:28AM +0800, 彭冲 wrote:
> Hi, Bruce
>
> ```
>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> Modify pg_read_all_data() and pg_write_all_data() to read/write large objects (Nitin Motiani, Nathan Bossart)
> <ulink url="&commit_baseurl;d98197602">§</ulink>
> </para>
>
> <para>
> These functions are designed to allow non-super users to run pg_dump.
> </para>
> </listitem>
>
> ```
>
>
> I found the feature description is inaccurate.: “pg_read_all_data” and “pg_write_all_data” are system roles.
>
> Besides, i think this feature should not category to Functions.
Ah, very good point. It item reworded and moved to the server
configuration section. Patch attached and applied.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| master.diff | text/x-diff | 1.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2026-05-30 18:57:20 | Re: should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins? |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-05-30 18:21:10 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |