| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st |
| Date: | 2026-05-28 18:42:41 |
| Message-ID: | ahiLmvtaFWnTsFVu@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2026-May-28, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hi, I just pushed this to github to see how it would behave. In case
> anyone is curious, the run is here,
>
> https://github.com/alvherre/postgres/actions/runs/26591496806
>
> Overall I get the impression that it's much slower than Cirrus. [...]
>
> If I read the Github docs correctly, I get 2000 run minutes for free
> each month. That would mean I can run at most some ... 15 runs per
> month? That sounds quite limiting.
It ended up taking 3 hours 3 minutes, which means I can do 10.9 of those
per month. Further runs will take less time due to ccache I suppose,
but the actual build is not a huge fraction of the total run time.
Linux+CompilerWarnings totalled 89 minutes; if I subtract those from the
total, I need 94 minutes to run the other builds, and then I can do 21.2
runs per month.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2026-05-28 18:47:50 | Key joins |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-05-28 18:40:52 | Re: dependencyLockAndCheckObject(): dependent vs referenced |