Re: High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks

From: Mike Bridge <mike(at)bridgecanada(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks
Date: 2004-03-14 03:10:18
Message-ID: ahi7509sakjto0b0nncmrl486ulot26vfh@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>Since the postmaster is a single unthreaded process, it's quite
>impossible for it to take up 100% of two CPUs. Could you be more
>precise about which processes were eating CPU, and what they were
>doing according to the available state data? (ps auxww and
>pg_stat_activity can be helpful tools.)
>
> regards, tom lane

I shut down all our clients (all java except one in perl), and
pg_stat_activity showed that there was still one query active. That's
a good table to know about! Anyway, it didn't end until I sent it a
TERM signal. I assume this means there's a runaway query somewhere,
which I'll have to hunt down.

But if the client dies, doesn't postgresql normally terminate the
query that that client initiated? Or do I need to set
statement_timeout?

(As for the 100% CPU, I was confused by the fact that I was getting
two lines in "top" (on Linux) with 99% utilization---I assume with two
runaway queries.)

Thanks for your help!

-Mike

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2004-03-14 03:48:01 Re: severe performance issue with planner
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-13 23:17:08 Re: High CPU with 7.4.1 after running for about 2 weeks