| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Alex Guo <guo(dot)alex(dot)hengchen(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fix DROP PROPERTY GRAPH "unsupported object class" error |
| Date: | 2026-06-03 02:21:52 |
| Message-ID: | ah-PwIK3wBqh2VpU@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 12:27:19PM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> The objects in those two catalogs can be manipulated using ALTER
> PROPERTY GRAPH ... ALTER VERTEX/EDGE TABLE ... subcommands. If an
> event trigger is used to keep copies of the same property graph on
> multiple different clusters (logical replicas?) in sync, they will
> need to be handed over these objects.
+1. Even after re-reading the thread again, deciding to skip these
catalogs for the object descriptions still looks like an inconsistent
move compared to all the other catalogs.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-06-03 02:25:28 | Re: pg_createsubscriber: allow duplicate publication names |
| Previous Message | lin teletele | 2026-06-03 01:58:40 | Re: Use pg_current_xact_id() instead of deprecated txid_current() |