Re: Move FOR PORTION OF checks out of analysis

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Move FOR PORTION OF checks out of analysis
Date: 2026-05-15 22:09:18
Message-ID: ageZEIRdmug-B1Ly@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2026-May-15, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:

> Starting a dedicated thread for this, based on [1]. To recap:
> [...]
> There is no commitfest entry yet, so I'll make one from this thread.

Please note that this doesn't need a commitfest entry -- since it's a
bug introduced during PG19, it needs to be listed as an open item
instead, to make sure we get it fixed before releasing 19. Please add
it to the list here
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Open_Items

Thanks,

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Los trabajadores menos efectivos son sistematicamente llevados al lugar
donde pueden hacer el menor daño posible: gerencia." (El principio Dilbert)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2026-05-15 23:18:43 Re: Bug in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER / ... CONNECTION with broken old server
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-05-15 21:21:48 Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer dereference in PG19