Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Date: 2026-05-12 20:31:42
Message-ID: agOOLswJwaZphCNf@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:57:57AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> I would be interested in seeing a summary of where we landed in terms
> of criteria for what should be in the release notes on this thread,
> since it is split across many emails. I get the sense that we've
> shifted it a bit based on discussion in this thread, and I can't quite
> grasp the specifics. And people who replied early on but not after the
> discussion led to changes may not be paying attention to the thread
> anymore.

If multiple people suggest a change, it is probably the right thing to
do so I do it. I have posted a list of everything I excluded, so that
could be used to analyze what was missing. I do miscategorize items
every time I do this, so I expect such adjustments. If the general
readers report that something is missing or wrong, it means I made a
serious mistake and none of this review process caught it --- it has
happened a few times over the years.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-05-12 20:34:18 Re: FOR PORTION OF does not recompute GENERATED STORED columns that depend on the range column
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-05-12 20:27:55 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes