| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing jsonb_ ... functions on DOCs |
| Date: | 2026-05-11 02:08:36 |
| Message-ID: | agE6JF1AvxKL0anI@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 01:49:51PM -0300, Marcos Pegoraro wrote:
> None of these functions are documented, Is this intentional ?
> If not, how can these functions be there ?
> An additional table right after operators ?
> Just a comment on the correspondent operator ?
Well, it seems to me that the intention is that it is pointless to
document the functions because that the users need only to be aware of
the operators, and the operators are enough to manipulate the jsonb
blobs. Documenting the functions would be just duplicating what we
already have for the operators, as listed here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-json.html
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2026-05-11 02:39:09 | Re: Proposal: tighten validation for legacy EUC encodings or document that accepted byte sequences may be unconvertible to UTF8 |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2026-05-11 02:06:23 | Re: on_error table, saving error info to a table |