Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bump minimum supported version of psql and pg_{dump,dumpall,upgrade} to v10
Date: 2026-05-06 21:47:15
Message-ID: afu248qSjSvL7XAT@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 03:10:51PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I wrote a new set of patches on a plane a couple of weeks ago, but I forgot
> to post them. I'm not yet 100% positive I've got the changes to
> rewrite_multixacts() in the pg_upgrade patch correct, but otherwise it's
> pretty mechanical and straightforward.

Best I can tell, the rewrite_multixacts() changes are fine. I also noticed
a couple of accidental removals of v11 stuff in the psql patch, which
should be fixed in the attached.

--
nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-pg_dump-pg_dumpall-bump-minimum-supported-version.patch text/plain 30.0 KB
v3-0002-pg_upgrade-bump-minimum-supported-version-to-v10.patch text/plain 32.6 KB
v3-0003-psql-bump-minimum-supported-version-to-v10.patch text/plain 20.9 KB
v3-0004-run-pgindent.patch text/plain 59.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2026-05-06 21:46:49 Re: Why clearing the VM doesn't require registering vm buffer in wal record