Re: speeding up planning with partitions

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Imai Yoshikazu <yoshikazu_i443(at)live(dot)jp>, "jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com" <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Amit Langote'" <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Date: 2019-03-27 00:22:13
Message-ID: afe14265-07fc-08ae-78d7-12409e3bab1e@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019/03/27 1:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> 0002 is a new patch to get rid of the duplicate RTE and PlanRowMark that's
>> created for partitioned parent table, as it's pointless. I was planning
>> to propose it later, but decided to post it now if we're modifying the
>> nearby code anyway.
>
> Good idea, but it needs a bit more work on nearby comments, and the
> logic in expand_single_inheritance_child could be simplified, and
> you evidently didn't try check-world because the RTE-removal causes
> cosmetic changes in postgres_fdw.out. I fixed that up and pushed
> this part.

Thanks. Sorry that I left a lot to be done.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-27 00:23:01 Re: basebackup checksum verification
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2019-03-27 00:21:22 RE: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction