| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix race condition in pg_get_publication_tables with concurrent DROP TABLE |
| Date: | 2026-04-28 05:54:47 |
| Message-ID: | afBLp8VLEuql9bCr@bdtpg |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:21:54PM -0700, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 8:59 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > I initially considered an injection point but chose polling since the
> > > TAP test reproduced the bug consistently with hundreds of tables on my
> > > dev system. I've now added an injection point for predictability.
> > >
> > > I adjusted the commit message a bit. Please find the attached v3 patch
> > > for further review. Thank you!
Thanks for the new version!
> > Thanks Bharath. I have just one minor comment:
> >
> > + INJECTION_POINT("pg-get-publication-tables-build-list", NULL);
> >
> > Shall we name it as 'pg-get-publication-tables-list-built' to be more
> > meaningful, as we are pausing after list is built.
>
> Sure. How about pg-get-publication-tables-after-list-built? It's 42
> bytes, under the INJ_NAME_MAXLEN of 64 bytes, but meaningful.
That looks ok to me.
Just still 2 minor comments:
1/
+ # Drop the table while the SRF is paused.
s/the SRF/ pg_get_publication_tables()/ ?
2/
+# pg_get_publication_tables race with concurrent DROP TABLE.
What about describing a bit more the bug? The other tests in 100_bugs.pl describe
the bug they're testing.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2026-04-28 05:58:43 | Re: ri_LockPKTuple misleading message |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-04-28 05:46:34 | Re: StringInfo fixes, v19 edition. Plus a few oddities |