Re: GiST operator class for bool

From: Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GiST operator class for bool
Date: 2021-12-06 21:35:58
Message-ID: af3d2ba9-fc72-69af-be51-7a3181fa661a@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

I don't see any changes in the documentation.[1]

Should bool appear in the looong list of supported operator classes?

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/btree-gist.html

--
Pavel Luzanov
Postgres Professional: https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2021-12-06 22:37:37 Re: Why doesn't pgstat_report_analyze() focus on not-all-visible-page dead tuple counts, specifically?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-12-06 21:19:08 Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions