Re: DNS (was: pgfoundry is down)

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DNS (was: pgfoundry is down)
Date: 2007-11-16 18:42:50
Message-ID: af1bce590711161042v2db9aad7t2de2a7946319b94a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

I could provide a slave NS as well.

On 11/16/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:54:02PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > No, but thanks ... if Afilias could provide another backup, that would
> be cool
> > for redundancy purposes ...
>
> Right, it wasn't a wholesale replacement, but another set of nameservers.
> We have currently five large nodes anycasted around the world, serving
> from
> Amsterdam, Miami, Toronto, Seattle, and (in process of turn up this week)
> Hong Kong. If we added one or two nameservers to the NS set, then we
> should
> get coverage from everywhere in the world. So if people still want it,
> I'll
> see what I can do. (There are some rules about which IPs are allowed to
> be
> used, so I'll have to make sure we can do it, but I can't see why not.)
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> Old sigs will return after re-constitution of blue smoke
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-16 18:47:32 Put conova in their place
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-11-16 18:42:01 Re: DNS