Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h
Date: 2026-05-07 21:12:09
Message-ID: af0AKUfzjGDvQdBk@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 03:41:56PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +/*
> + * We can only define TAS_SPIN if TAS was defined. Otherwise, the platform
> + * defined its own S_LOCK without TAS, and therefore is responsible for
> + * defining its own TAS_SPIN as well. (Note that we currently do not have any
> + * platforms that don't define TAS.)
> + */
> #if !defined(TAS_SPIN)
> +#if defined(TAS)
> #define TAS_SPIN(lock) TAS(lock)
> -#endif /* TAS_SPIN */
> +#else
> +#error Neither TAS nor TAS_SPIN defined on this platform. Please report this to pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
> +#endif /* TAS */
> +#endif /* ! TAS_SPIN */

Wait, this isn't right. TAS_SPIN is only used by s_lock(), which is only
used by the default S_LOCK. We should just not compile s_lock() if the
platform defines its own S_LOCK, and we shouldn't #error here if TAS is not
defined.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-05-07 21:28:09 Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h
Previous Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-05-07 21:06:07 Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade