| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h |
| Date: | 2026-05-07 21:12:09 |
| Message-ID: | af0AKUfzjGDvQdBk@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 03:41:56PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> +/*
> + * We can only define TAS_SPIN if TAS was defined. Otherwise, the platform
> + * defined its own S_LOCK without TAS, and therefore is responsible for
> + * defining its own TAS_SPIN as well. (Note that we currently do not have any
> + * platforms that don't define TAS.)
> + */
> #if !defined(TAS_SPIN)
> +#if defined(TAS)
> #define TAS_SPIN(lock) TAS(lock)
> -#endif /* TAS_SPIN */
> +#else
> +#error Neither TAS nor TAS_SPIN defined on this platform. Please report this to pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
> +#endif /* TAS */
> +#endif /* ! TAS_SPIN */
Wait, this isn't right. TAS_SPIN is only used by s_lock(), which is only
used by the default S_LOCK. We should just not compile s_lock() if the
platform defines its own S_LOCK, and we shouldn't #error here if TAS is not
defined.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-05-07 21:28:09 | Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h |
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-05-07 21:06:07 | Re: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade |