Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the same transaction

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the same transaction
Date: 2017-09-22 19:06:11
Message-ID: aeda27ae-dac6-02dd-9c57-3fe28e49d5e9@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/21/17 04:43, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>> Once we got this patch, DROP SUBSCRIPTION is not transactional either
>> if dropping a replication slot or if the subscription got disabled in
>> a transaction block. But we disallow to do DROP SUBSCRIPTION in a
>> transaction block only in the former case. In the latter case, we
>> adopted such non-transactional behaviour. Since these behaviours would
>> be complex for users I attached the documentation patch explaining it.
>>
> Hmm, isn't there necessary to care and mention about this kind of
> inconsistent behavior in docs?

I have added documentation that certain forms of CREATE/DROP
SUBSCRIPTION cannot be run inside a transaction block, which we have
done for other such commands.

I don't think we need to go into further detail. We don't guarantee
continuous connections. If a worker is stopped and restarted in the
background as an implementation detail, then the user is not impacted.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-22 19:12:29 Re: Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed
Previous Message balazs 2017-09-22 18:59:04 BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?