Re: logical replication restrictions

From: "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: "Amit Kapila" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marcos Pegoraro" <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication restrictions
Date: 2022-03-22 01:09:58
Message-ID: aec5dd79-245c-454e-ae28-00ba3c8977ed@www.fastmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 21, 2022, at 10:04 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2022-03-20 21:40:40 -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022, at 9:18 PM, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > > Long time, no patch. Here it is. I will provide documentation in the next
> > > version. I would appreciate some feedback.
> > This patch is broken since commit 705e20f8550c0e8e47c0b6b20b5f5ffd6ffd9e33. I
> > rebased it.
>
> This fails tests, specifically it seems psql crashes:
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6592281292570624?logs=cores#L46
Yeah. I forgot to test this patch with cassert before sending it. :( I didn't
send a new patch because there is another issue (with int128) that I'm
currently reworking. I'll send another patch soon.

--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 01:11:18 Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-22 01:09:12 Re: WaitLatchOrSocket seems to not count to 4 right...