Re: Make copyObject work in C++

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Date: 2026-04-16 11:31:27
Message-ID: aeDIj2SBDl0EHZtb@bdtpg
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.04.26 15:10, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 11:41:39AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 07:54:07AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ok, I have committed the shown patch.
> > >
> > > d50c86e74375 added a comment mentionning that StaticAssertStmt is deprecated, so
> > > we really need the one added in test_cplusplusext.cpp?
> >
> > Now that 66ad764c8d5 is in, the only remaining use of StaticAssertStmt() is in
> > test_cplusplusext.cpp. What about the attached to get rid of it?
>
> This is a test module. Even if the construct is deprecated, we can still
> test it.

Right, but I was thinking that if we introduce a "pg_attribute_deprecated" macro
(like discussed in [1] and [2]) and make use of it for StaticAssertStmt(), then
this test module would generate Warnings.

We can still come back to it should the above be implemented.

[1]: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGK2zuRevnNzCpVzLA7ieHnJoYPnDvgtWRcB4pVnOzchhQ%40mail.gmail.com
[2]: https://postgr.es/m/aRGa87Ab0f3ItWRV@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message lakshmi 2026-04-16 12:10:32 Re: Pgbench: remove synchronous prepare
Previous Message Mihail Nikalayeu 2026-04-16 11:18:55 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]