Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea

From: Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)mksoft(dot)nu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
Date: 2021-11-18 17:24:36
Message-ID: ae9ea686-4bf9-3939-34af-3ca88caf30d8@mksoft.nu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-11-18 17:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> I noticed that, a week after Michael pushed 9ff47ea41 to silence
> -Wcompound-token-split-by-macro warnings, buildfarm member sidewinder
> is still spewing them. Investigation shows that it's building with
>
> configure: using compiler=cc (nb4 20200810) 7.5.0
> configure: using CLANG=ccache clang

Hm, actually it's:

CC => "ccache cc",
CXX => "ccache c++",
CLANG => "ccache clang",

want me to change it to:

CC => "ccache clang",
CXX => "ccache c++",
CLANG => "ccache clang",

?

/Mikael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-11-18 17:31:28 Re: Mixing CC and a different CLANG seems like a bad idea
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-18 17:24:14 Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?