From: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance regressions |
Date: | 2020-12-08 13:53:41 |
Message-ID: | ae83dd32-fe64-0a36-0c54-a04acf40a28b@postgresfriends.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/9/20 9:29 AM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been doing some benchmarking on recent version of PostgreSQL and
> I'm seeing some regressions. The benchmark setup is as described in [1]
> except it looks like I got lucky in the runs used for that article.
>
> After many more runs, I get these NOPM averages (hopefully formatting
> will survive):
>
> Users: 50 100 250 500
> 12.4 485,914 707,535 739,808 589,856
> 13.0 485,501 697,505 837,446 385,225
> 14(2020-10-13) 521,902 759,609 941,212 611,647
> 14(2020-11-02) 478,640 684,138 930,959 513,707
I must have done something wrong because I cannot reproduce this
anymore. Please disregard.
--
Vik Fearing
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2020-12-08 14:27:15 | Re: Implement <null treatment> for window functions |
Previous Message | Eugen Konkov | 2020-12-08 13:46:44 | Re: Feature Request: Report additionally error value |