Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Matsumura, Ryo" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]a new data type 'bytea' for ECPG
Date: 2019-02-15 12:11:45
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I agree that the special route is ugly, but I cannot remove them
> completely.
> I try to implement Idea-2. In same time, I try to move if(bytea)
> blocks to
> new function for readability.
> e.g. move the following to new function set_data_attr().

I don't think this will help much, don't bother.

Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2019-02-15 12:19:30 Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2019-02-15 12:01:29 Re: Incorrect visibility test function assigned to snapshot