Re: test_autovacuum/001_parallel_autovacuum is broken

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniil Davydov <3danissimo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test_autovacuum/001_parallel_autovacuum is broken
Date: 2026-04-09 23:15:34
Message-ID: adgzFv0CSSy_h9CB@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 11:18:45AM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> It might also be useful if an injection point is activated on the
> particular database rather than cluster-wide.

Indeed. One can design a lot of conditions like that. The important
part for me is to find use-cases for them, rather than pile them in
the code for potential "future" uses.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2026-04-09 23:29:45 Re: Heads Up: cirrus-ci is shutting down June 1st
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2026-04-09 23:05:02 Re: Allow a condition string in an injection point