Re: Improve performance of pg_strtointNN functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Improve performance of pg_strtointNN functions
Date: 2022-12-02 07:35:10
Message-ID: ade63753-a367-7697-3117-3a097244d63f@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01.12.22 06:38, David Rowley wrote:
> If this was going to cause huge conflicts with Peter's patch then I
> might think differently. I feel like it's a fairly trivial task to
> rebase.
>
> If the consensus is that we should fix this afterwards, then I'm happy to delay.

If we are happy with this patch, then it's okay with me if you push this
first. I'll probably need to do another pass over my patch anyway, so a
bit more work isn't a problem.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-12-02 07:36:38 Re: Introduce a new view for checkpointer related stats
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-12-02 07:30:55 refactor ExecGrant_*() functions