| From: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp, sunchengxi(at)highgo(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Is it useful to record whether plans are generic or custom? |
| Date: | 2021-04-05 09:01:48 |
| Message-ID: | add1e591fbe8874107e75d04328859ec@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-03-26 17:46, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/03/26 0:33, torikoshia wrote:
>> On 2021-03-25 22:14, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> On 2021/03/23 16:32, torikoshia wrote:
>>>> On 2021-03-05 17:47, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your comments!
>>>
>>> Thanks for updating the patch!
>>>
>>> PostgreSQL Patch Tester reported that the patched version failed to
>>> be compiled
>>> at Windows. Could you fix this issue?
>>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.131238
>>>
>>
>> It seems PGDLLIMPORT was necessary..
>> Attached a new one.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch!
>
> In my test, generic_calls for a utility command was not incremented
> before PL/pgSQL function was executed. Maybe this is expected behavior.
> But it was incremented after the function was executed. Is this a bug?
> Please see the following example.
Thanks for reviewing!
It's a bug and regrettably it seems difficult to fix it during this
commitfest.
Marked the patch as "Withdrawn".
Regards,
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-04-05 09:29:14 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2021-04-05 08:15:47 | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |