From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Kerberos test suite |
Date: | 2018-03-06 16:00:48 |
Message-ID: | adae00ed-aae0-0b83-859e-632bf234cc04@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/5/18 21:08, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +my $kdc_port = int(rand() * 16384) + 49152;
> That may not be worth worrying as that's an ephemeral port range but it
> can make the test a bit unstable...
This is what we've been using in the other tests as well. It's clearly
not optimal, but making it more robust in a platform-agnostic way seems
tricky.
> Perhaps the tests should be skipped on Windows or just produce an error?
> Like LDAP tests, libraries are supported on Windows but the hardcoded
> paths make things harder to handle there.
Hmm, why couldn't someone install MIT krb5 on Windows and give it a try?
We don't need to block the platform outright.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-06 16:16:04 | Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate. |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-03-06 15:58:54 | Re: Kerberos test suite |