Re: dshash_find_or_insert vs. OOM

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: dshash_find_or_insert vs. OOM
Date: 2026-04-08 01:04:50
Message-ID: adWpsq8d0GSq6Ao-@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 12:00:14PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> My apologies for the late response here. I spent some time looking at
> this yesterday and came to the conclusion that we can add dshash tests
> to test_dsm_registry, which already allocates a dshash via
> GetNamedDSHash(). However, I also realized that the API has a gap: callers
> cannot set a size limit on the dshash. I need this for the test, but
> more importantly it's a limitation of the API itself.

As in dsa_set_size_limit() cannot be set for a dshash currently.
Indeed that could be independently useful for some use cases.

> So I plan to
> target v20 for the tests, as it's likely too late for v19. To start, I've
> submitted a patch for allowing callers to set a size limit on a
> GetNamedDSHash()-allocated dshash [1].
>
> [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6655/

That's too late for v19, at least here. Thanks for pursuing this
work.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-04-08 01:08:46 Re: Return DSA area for hash table from GetNamedDSHash()
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-04-08 01:03:33 Re: Add errdetail() with PID and UID about source of termination signal