Re: Adding locks statistics

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding locks statistics
Date: 2026-04-07 04:21:39
Message-ID: adSGU67l6NQWg_m7@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 06, 2026 at 03:34:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This one was a simple puzzle: there was a race condition between the
> detach done by a local point and the wait/detach sequence. As we want
> a detach, dropping the local point is proving to work here.
>
> I am going to do a few more runs to gain some more confidence.

Done a total of 5 runs (or 6 actually), and fixed it.

> Bertrand, could you confirm please?

That's of course always welcome. I'll keep an eye on the CI and the
buildfarm.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2026-04-07 04:40:16 Re: Adjust error message for CREATE STATISTICS to account for expressions
Previous Message jian he 2026-04-07 04:03:52 Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete