Re: Database-level collation version tracking

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Database-level collation version tracking
Date: 2022-02-08 11:14:02
Message-ID: ad5e7040-4c46-6c8f-2daf-611546bb857d@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07.02.22 17:08, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> There's so limited testing in collate.* regression tests, so I thought it would
> be ok to add it there. At least some ALTER DATABASE ... REFRESH VERSION would
> be good, similarly to collation-level versioning.

I don't think you can run ALTER DATABASE from the regression test
scripts, since the database name is not fixed. You'd have to paste the
command together using psql tricks or something. I guess it could be
done, but maybe there is a better solution. We could put it into the
createdb test suite, or write a new TAP test suite somewhere. There is
no good precedent for this.

>> That code takes a RowExclusiveLock on pg_database. Did you have something
>> else in mind?
>
> But that lock won't prevent a concurrent DROP DATABASE, so it's totally
> expected to hit that cache lookup failed error. There should either be a
> shdepLockAndCheckObject(), or changing the error message to some errmsg("data
> xxx does not exist").

I was not familiar with that function. AFAICT, it is only used for
database and role settings (AlterDatabaseSet(), AlterRoleSet()), but not
when just updating the role or database catalog (e.g., AlterRole(),
RenameRole(), RenameDatabase()). So I don't think it is needed here.
Maybe I'm missing something.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2022-02-08 11:59:41 Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
Previous Message Frédéric Yhuel 2022-02-08 10:21:25 Should pg_restore vacuum the tables before the post-data stage?