Re: Add support for EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS for meson

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Cc: Rustam ALLAKOV <rustamallakov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add support for EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS for meson
Date: 2026-03-31 10:46:35
Message-ID: acumC5qBYIYNRF8U@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> Agreed, the question is just where we should document them.
>
> I would say one of these two pages:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/install-meson.html
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/regress-run.html

regress-run would be a nicer fit in the long run, where it seems to me
that the existing documentation is wrong with its decision to document
the regression tests that can be run in meson in a section for the
build and install:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/install-meson.html#INSTALL-PROCEDURE-MESON

The format that we use for the coverage code is something I find
pretty clear:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/regress-coverage.html

We have two sub-sections, one for configure/make and one meson, which
is nice. Perhaps we don't need to have new sub-sections, limiting
ourselves to mention some of the equivalents that can be used with
meson?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-03-31 10:47:18 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-03-31 10:45:50 Re: relfilenode statistics