Re: Code quality issues in ICU patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code quality issues in ICU patch
Date: 2017-06-30 12:13:44
Message-ID: accde5ce-6421-1ea8-842c-dbcb5644d462@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/24/17 11:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ah, I was about to suggest the same thing, but I was coming at it from
> the standpoint of not requiring buffers several times larger than
> necessary, which could in itself cause avoidable palloc failures.
>
> I was going to suggest a small variant actually: run the conversion
> function an extra time only if the string is long enough to make the
> space consumption interesting, say

I had thought about something like that, too, but my concern is that we
then have double the code paths to test. I have run some performance
tests and I couldn't detect any differences between the variants. So
unless someone has any other insights, I think I'll go with the proposed
patch by tomorrow.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2017-06-30 12:18:53 Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-06-30 12:10:03 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres process invoking exit resulting in sh-QUIT core