Re: Adding locks statistics

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, "L(dot) pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding locks statistics
Date: 2026-03-24 03:15:05
Message-ID: acIBuaf0SXRkbPfx@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 08:18:05AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> It looks like that aio_funcs.c does not need lock.h (reported by include-what-you-use).
> If we remove its direct include, it's still indirectly included through proc.h
> though. But I think that removing its direct include makes sense as it's not
> needed at all.
>
> If we still need to discuss about those lock.h related changes, maybe it's
> worth creating a dedicated thread?

This patch set is related to an entirely different topic than what we
are discussing, so yes, a different thread would be adapted.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-03-24 03:31:02 Re: [Proposal] Adding Log File Capability to pg_createsubscriber
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-03-24 03:11:44 Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile