Re: Change checkpoint‑record‑missing PANIC to FATAL

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change checkpoint‑record‑missing PANIC to FATAL
Date: 2026-03-23 00:55:24
Message-ID: acCPfL7g8mmKT3sz@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 07:56:46PM +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> That's a good point. I agree these new cases are very close to what we
> already have on HEAD. I can rework this to avoid duplication by
> grouping them with the existing tests.

Thanks. I am not sure if I will be able to follow up the work of this
thread for this commit fest, so I'll probably consider more
improvements in this area once v20 opens for business around the end
of June.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2026-03-23 01:14:23 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-03-23 00:44:38 Re: amcheck: fix bug of missing corruption in allequalimage validation