| From: | Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: PSQL Should \sv & \ev work with materialized views? | 
| Date: | 2024-03-28 23:02:11 | 
| Message-ID: | ac4eoj5gcqxocgz66xlwfpqol7a5ln72kw7nk3yg544mig6ti4@emu5rtiomnz6 | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On 2023-05-15 06:32 +0200, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> Personally I would appreciate it if \sv actually showed you the DDL.
> Oftentimes I will \ev something to review it, with syntax highlighting.
+1.  I was just reviewing some matviews and was surprised that psql
lacks commands to show their definitions.
But I think that it should be separate commands \sm and \em because we
already have commands \dm and \dv that distinguish between matviews and
views.
> This should not be that difficult.  Just looking for feedback.
> Admittedly \e is questionable, because you cannot really apply the changes.
> ALTHOUGH, I would consider that I could
> BEGIN;
> DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW ...;
> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW ...;
> 
> Which I had to do to change the WITH DATA so it creates with data when we
> reload our object.s
I think this could even be handled by optional modifiers, e.g. \em emits
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW ... WITH NO DATA and \emD emits WITH DATA.
Although I wouldn't mind manually changing WITH NO DATA to WITH DATA.
-- 
Erik
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-03-28 23:15:13 | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed | 
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-28 22:34:02 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |